FREE CONSULTATION

Toll Free : 800.808.4225

Local : 212.808.0448

se habla español

говорим
по русски

mówimy polsku

BRAND BRAND NOMBERG
& ROSENBAUM, LLP

Appeals

Construction workers’ multi-million dollar verdict upheld
Janda v. Michael Rienzi Trust, 78 AD3d 899, 912 NYS2d 237 [2d Dept. 2010].

An illegal Polish immigrant was injured while performing construction work on the defendant’s premises. The defendant argued that he was not entitled to his lost earnings claim because he was illegal and contended that he was not disabled. The jury in a unanimous verdict in Queens County found otherwise and both the lower court and the appellate division upheld the majority of the verdict.

Defendant Old Navy may be responsible for Employee’s Death
Ruiz v. Griffin, 71 AD3d 1112, 898 NYS2d 590 [2d Dept. 2010].

The Appellate Division reveresed the lower court’s decision dismissing the case against Old Navy.  A man with a rifle shot and killed an employee of Old Navy while being escorted to his car by Old Navy agents.  The two agents had no security training and left the plaintiff alone as they approached the car so they could get cigarettes.  Old Navy had the plaintiff park in same spot every day to catch the perpetrator which also let the perpetrator know where to find the plaintiff.  Whether Old Navy knew or should have known that a third person may cause harm to the plaintiff and failed to take reasonable action, and whether Old Navy increased the risk of injury were issues of facts to be decided by the jury, not the Court.

Village Crossing Guard may be Liable for Car striking a Child
Lopez v. Beltre, 59 A.D.3d 683, 873 N.Y.S.2d 726 [2d Dept. 2009].

The Appellate Divsion reversed the lower court’s decision dismissing the case against the Village holding that it was an issue that required a jury determination.

Defendant Loses Motion to Dismiss Wrongful Death Case
Ruiz v. Griffin, 50 A.D.3d 1005, 856 N.Y.S.2d 641 [2d Dept. 2008]

The Appellate Division affirmed the Lower Court finding that summary judgment was premature and that the Workers’ Compensation Law did not bar the suit against Old Navy.

Defendant held Responsible for Poorly Maintained Roadway at Railroad Crossing
Reyes v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 19 A.D.3d 193, 796 N.Y.S.2d 606 [1st Dept. 2005].

The Appellate Division reversed, reinstated the plaintiff’s complaint, and granted plaintiff partial summary judgment, holding that N.Y. R.R. Law § 21 imposed a duty of maintenance which required the railroad to maintain grade crossings in a reasonable, safe condition and that such duty was continuous, non-delegable, and not abrogated.

Novice Horseback Rider Did Not Assume Risk of Injury When Trail Guides Left him Alone on Trail
Lipari v. Babylon Riding Center, Inc., 18 A.D.3d 824, 796 N.Y.S.2d 632 [2d Dept. 2005].

The Appellate Division reversed, reinstating the complaint, and held that the plaintiff, a novice horseback rider did not assume the heightened risk created by the alleged negligent conduct of the trail guides in leaving him unattended in the rear of a line of horses.

Plaintiff Quashes Defendant’s Subpoena for a Deposition of a Treating Physician Tannenbaum v. Tenenbaum, 8 A.D.3d 360, 777 N.Y.S.2d 769 [2d Dept. 2004].

The Appellate Division affirmed the Order of the Lower Court which granted the plaintiff’s motion for a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3103 quashing his subpoena of a nonparty treating physician, with costs against the defendant.

Plaintiff’s Default Judgment Against Defendant Upheld
Rivera v City of New York, 7 A.D.3d 774, 776 N.Y.S.2d 867 [2d Dept. 2004].

After a trial, the Appellate Division upheld the judgment against the defendant, finding no reasonable excuse for the failure to timely vacate the default.

Plumber Who Fell into Excavated Hole that Collapsed is Permitted to Have The Case Heard by a Jury
Fernez v. Kellogg, 2 A.D.3d 397, 767 N.Y.S.2d 864 [2d Dept. 2003].

The Appellate Court reversed, reinstated the complaint, and held that the plaintiff demonstrated issues of material fact as to Labor Law 200 and 241(6) violations involving an unguarded excavation that collapsed while a plumber was working to fix a leaking pipe.

Jury’s Award against Dentist Who Negligently Fails To Diagnose Periodontal Disease and Treat the Patient is Upheld
Davanzo v. Fisher, D.D.S., 304 A.D.2d 452, 758 N.Y.S.2d 49 [1st Dept. 2003].

Appellate Division upholds jury trial verdict of $271,600 alleging failure to diagnose or treat periodontal disease.  The trial court properly dismissed defendant’s defense alleging genetic predisposition as there was no evidence to support the claim. The court’s missing witness charge was proper.

Court Permits Inmate to Recover $100,000 For Assault and Broken Nose
Zucker v. County of Westchester, 271 A.D.2d 604, 706 N.Y.S.2d 154 [2d Dept. 2000].

The Appellate Division upheld the liability verdict against correctional facility for failing to protect inmate from being attacked by other inmates, though finding the damages of $330,000 for a broken nose excessive, reducing the award to $100,000.
Defendants Continuous Treatment Prevents Dismissal Based Upon Statute Of Limitations
Dolfini v. Morilla, 261 A.D.2d 431, 690 N.Y.S.2d 79 [2d Dept. 1999].

Appellate Division reversed and reinstated the complaint, finding there were disputed issues of material fact as to whether the statute of limitations was tolled by defendants’ continuous treatment of a lump later diagnosed as malignant breast cancer.

Defendant Held Responsible for Construction Worker Who Falls Off Ladder
Grayson v. City of New York, 241 A.D.2d 338, 659 N.Y.S.2d 287 [1st Dept. 1997].

Appellate Division unanimously reversed and granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) after falling off a ladder that did not have proper braces to prevent movement while using a drill.

Defendant Denied A Second Physical Examination of Plaintiff
Fortuniewicz v. Lawrence Hospital, 229 A.D.2d 514, 644 N.Y.S.2d 1015 [2d Dept.1996].

Appellate Division upholds Lower Court’s denial of a further physical examination of the infant plaintiff as defense counsel failed to demonstrate unusual or unanticipated circumstances after the filing of the note of issue.

Court’s Failure To Permit Plaintiff an Adjournment of Trial Held Improper
Goichberg v. Sotudeh, 187 A.D.2d 700, 590 N.Y.S.2d 283 [2d Dept. 1992].

Appellate Division reverses and holds trial court abused discretion in not granting an adjournment due to expert’s unavailability.